--> ABSTRACT: Calibration of Evaluation of Imaging Spectrometer Data: Cripple Creek, Colorado, by R. N. Clark, B. J. Middlebrook, G. A. Swayze, T. V. V. King, K. E. Livo, D. H. Knepper, and K. Lee; #91022 (1989)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Calibration of Evaluation of Imaging Spectrometer Data: Cripple Creek, Colorado

R. N. Clark, B. J. Middlebrook, G. A. Swayze, T. V. V. King, K. E. Livo, D. H. Knepper, K. Lee

Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) and Geophysical Environmental Imaging Spectrometer (GERIS) data were obtained over Cripple Creek and Canon City, Colorado, on October 19, 1987, and September 16, 1988, respectively. The region contains Tertiary volcanic rocks and Precambrian metamorphic and plutonic rocks, including areas of well-known alteration and mineralization.

Many ground calibration sites in the area were measured with a field spectrometer, and samples were returned to the laboratory for more detailed spectral characterization. The laboratory data were used to calibrate the imaging spectrometer field data to ground reflectance. Laboratory reflectance spectra of samples collected at the calibration sites were convolved to match the resolution and sampling interval of each of the imaging spectrometers. Next, the corresponding raw spectral data, the laboratory calibration data, and the dark spectra were extracted. The imaging spectrometer spectra were then dark corrected and calibrated to ground reflectance.

Once calibrated, selected spectra in the image were extracted and examined and the signal-to-noise performance was computed. (The calibrated data sets can be used to derive reflectance spectra for direct analysis.) A simple spectral analysis was conducted to map specific absorption Previous HitbandNext Hit depths in the image. Absorption bands were chosen for minerals and vegetation that are known or likely to occur in the Cripple Creek area.

Previous HitBandNext Hit-depth images were computed for a number of minerals, including the 1.7-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of gypsum, the 1.27-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of biotite, the 2.34-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of calcite, the 2.32-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of dolomite, the 2.21-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of montmorillonite, the 2.20-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of kaolinite, the 0.45-µm and 0.93-µm bands of jarosite, the 0.85-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of hematite, and the 0.94-µm Previous HitbandNext Hit of goethite. A Previous HitbandNext Hit-depth image for the 0.68-µm Previous HitbandTop of Lodgepole pine was also computed.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91022©1989 AAPG Annual Convention, April 23-26, 1989, San Antonio, Texas.