--> ABSTRACT: Amplitude-Versus-Offset Analysis in Presence of Dip, by Jeffrey R. Resnick, Patrick Ng, and Ken Larner; #91035 (2010)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Previous HitAmplitudeNext Hit-Versus-Previous HitOffsetNext Hit Previous HitAnalysisNext Hit in Presence of Dip

Jeffrey R. Resnick, Patrick Ng, Ken Larner

Although exploration targets often lie on or near dipping horizons, most studies of seismic Previous HitamplitudeNext Hit Previous HitvariationNext Hit with Previous HitoffsetNext Hit have assumed all reflectors to be horizontal. Previous HitAmplitudeNext Hit-vs.-Previous HitoffsetNext Hit (AVO) Previous HitanalysisNext Hit need not be restricted to such simple cases. The presence of dip, however, can pose difficulties for AVO Previous HitanalysisNext Hit. Difficulties arise from: (1) errors in estimating parameters in AVO Previous HitanalysisNext Hit that depend on reflection angle, (2) mixing of information from different subsurface locations within a common-midpoint gather, (3) the dependence of normal-moveout corrections on reflector dip, and (4) interference of reflections by mispositioned events. If these problems are not addressed in processing, the dipping events in AVO Previous HitanalysisNext Hit can introduce artifacts that lead to erron ous interpretation. In dealing with problems posed by dip, either prestack partial migration or full migration before stack can be used. It is important to ensure that these prestack processes treat Previous HitamplitudeNext Hit properly. When such care is taken, dip is removed as an issue in performing AVO Previous HitanalysisTop on data from areas with structural complexity.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91035©1988 AAPG-SEPM-SEG Pacific Sections and SPWLA Annual Convention, Santa Barbara, California, 17-19 April 1988.