--> ABSTRACT: Model for Hydrocarbon Migration and Entrapment, by Urban S. Allan; #91043 (2011)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Model for Hydrocarbon Migration and Entrapment

Urban S. Allan

A model relates faulting to migration and entrapment. The basic assumption of the model is that a Previous HitfaultNext Hit is neither a seal nor a conduit. Therefore, the effect of faulting on both migration and entrapment depends on the rock properties of strata juxtaposed by the Previous HitfaultNext Hit and the structural attitude of the juxtaposed Previous HitfaultNext Hit blocks. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit plane section used with structure maps gives a three-dimensional view of migration and illustrates the interplay of three critical parameters: (1) closure style--unfaulted anticline, faulted anticline, or nose; (2) cross-Previous HitfaultNext Hit geometry--the throw and change of throw along a Previous HitfaultNext Hit; and (3) stratigraphic geometry--the thickness and spacing of permeable and impermeable units. Two types of spill points become apparent. Cross-Previous HitfaultNext Hit spill points occur at loci of juxtaposed permeable units at the Previous HitfaultNext Hit plane. Cross-Previous HitfaultNext Hit spill points define limits of trapping potential for each permeable unit and paths for vertical migration. Synclinal spill points occur when a permeable unit encounters no cross-Previous HitfaultTop spill point within the limits of structural closure. Synclinal spill points define tops of vertical migration paths and egress points for lateral migration.

Any charge model can be integrated and tested with this model, and migration timing can be evaluated by doing the analysis in paleostructural modes. The validity and importance of exceptions to the basic model assumption can be clarified by comparison with model predictions.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91043©1986 AAPG Annual Convention, Atlanta, Georgia, June 15-18, 1986.