--> Abstract: Environment-Energy Dilemma, Choices and Consequences, by Joseph D. Martinez; #90975 (1976).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract: Environment-Previous HitEnergyNext Hit Dilemma, Choices and Consequences

Joseph D. Martinez

The benefits of modern technology readily can be identified with Previous HitenergyNext Hit availability. A clear correlation has been established between per-capita Previous HitenergyNext Hit consumption and the gross national product for various nations. The United States is an outstanding example of a nation which has benefited from vast Previous HitenergyNext Hit reserves. The nation now is challenged, however, by dwindling reserves and the need to develop new sources consistent with the preservation of environmental quality. The development of new, virtually inexhaustible and environmentally acceptable sources cannot be expected for several decades. Meanwhile, we will have to depend on coal, nuclear Previous HitenergyNext Hit, and/or rigorous conservation measures.

The net effect of environmental considerations has been to delay and perhaps ultimately eliminate the nuclear-Previous HitenergyNext Hit option as a national Previous HitenergyNext Hit alternative. This forces a more positive move toward coal as the next major Previous HitsourceNext Hit of electric power. Our coal resources are large but the use and production of coal are also threats to the environment. Thus, we seem to be moving from one major accessible Previous HitsourceNext Hit to another because of environmental concern, only to face the certainty that the alternative also is environmentally unacceptable.

Controversies revolving about Previous HitenergyNext Hit choices must be resolved by an analysis of the relative benefits and impacts of these two sources and others. The pattern of changing Previous HitenergyNext Hit sources is not new. We have moved from wood to coal to Previous HitoilNext Hit and gas in the past and must learn to adapt in the future. Rational decisions must be made relative to the utilization of intermediate Previous HitenergyNext Hit sources pending development of promising future approaches. A collapse of current levels of Previous HitenergyNext Hit supply could threaten our technologic society and the means to develop a new Previous HitenergyNext Hit base.

We must consider benefits as well as environmental costs in evaluating Previous HitenergyNext Hit strategies. However, serious and continuing consideration must be given to the development of a set of social values which moderates our use of Previous HitenergyTop and lessens environmental stresses.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90975©1976 GCAGS- GC Section SEPM Annual Meeting Shreveport, Louisiana