--> Abstract: The Economic Interplay Between CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced CH4 Production from Coal Beds: Two Scenarios from Eastern Kansas, by Saibal Bhattacharya, K. D. Newell, and Timothy R. Carr; #90078 (2008)

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

The Economic Interplay Between CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced CH4 Production from Coal Beds: Two Scenarios from Eastern Kansas

Saibal Bhattacharya1, K. D. Newell1, and Timothy R. Carr2
1Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
2Dept of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV

Eastern Kansas is underlain by several thin Pennsylvanian coal beds (1 to 4 ft), which range in rank from high-volatile C to A bituminous. As-received gas contents are as high as 350 scf/ton, and several coal beds commonly produce in a single well. Coal can adsorb approximately twice the volume of CO2 than the desorbed CH4, and therefore offer potential for carbon sequestration with enhanced coal-bed methane (ECBM) recovery.

Two scenarios were simulated for injection of CO2-rich effluent gases generated respectively by a cement kiln and a landfill located in eastern Kansas into underlying coal beds. Critical factors affecting model performance include bed thickness and gas content, cleat spacing, porosity, and permeability, and adsorption isotherms. Results indicate that a large 5-spot pattern (160-acre spacing) utilizing a center-point injector can sequester CO2 for years while delaying ECBM recovery. Reduced well spacing facilitates faster ECBM recovery, but limits sequestration volume due to early CO2 breakthrough. Given bed thicknesses, cleat permeabilities, and conventional well spacing in the modeled areas, several dozen injection wells are needed to sequester the CO2 emitted by these point sources.

Monte-Carlo cost/revenue simulation determined minimum geologic requirements to economically sequester CO2 at the expense of delayed ECBM production. Depending on gas prices, a 15 to 30% increase in ECBM recovery is needed to justify the cost of a large 5-spot pattern which requires higher pipeline expenses. As a necessary next step, a small-scale pilot project should be initiated to validate modeling results.

 

AAPG Search and Discover Article #90078©2008 AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas