Sequences, Systems
Tracts
, and Eustatic Cycles
Henry W. Posamentier and Peter R. Vail
Depositional sequences are composed of genetically related sediments bounded
by unconformities or their correlative conformities and are related to cycles of
eustatic change. The bounding unconformities are inferred to be related to
eustatic fall inflection points. They will be either Type 1 or Type 2
unconformities depending on whether sea
level
fall was rapid (i.e., rate of
eustatic fall exceeded subsidence rate at the depositional shoreline break) or
slow (i.e., rate of eustatic fall was less than subsidence rate at the
depositional shoreline break). Each sequence is comprised of a succession of
systems
tracts
. Four
systems
tracts
are recognized: lowstand, transgressive,
highstand, and shelf margin
systems
tracts
. The lowstand
systems
tract is
subdivided into two parts lowstand fan and lowstand wedge where the basin margin
is characterized by a discrete physiographic shelf edge, or lower and upper
wedge where the basin margin is characterized by a ramp physiography. Each
systems
tract is comprised of a linkage of contemporaneous depositional
systems
.
Type 1 and Type 2 unconformities are each characterized by a basin-ward shift of coastal onlap concomitant with a cessation of fluvial deposition. The style of subaerial erosion characterizing each unconformity is different. Type 1 unconformities are characterized by stream rejuvenation and incision, whereas Type 2 unconformities typically are characterized by widespread erosion accompanying gradual denudation or degradation of the landscape. Stream rejuvenation and incision are not associated with this type of unconformity.
On the slope and in the basin, Type 1 unconformities typically are overlain
by lowstand fan or lowstand wedge deposits, whereas Type 2 unconformities are
overlain by shelf-margin systems
tract deposits. Within incised valleys on the
shelf, Type 1 unconformities are overlain by either fluvial (lowstand wedge) or
estuarine (transgressive) deposits. Type 2 unconformities typically are
characterized by a change in parasequence stacking pattern from progradational
to aggradational.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91030©1988 AAPG Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, 20-23 March 1988.