--> Carbon Sequestration Challenges in Kentucky, by James A. Drahovzal, Brandon C. Nuttall, Stephen F. Greb, Thomas M. Parris, David C. Harris, and Cortland F. Eble, #80012 (2008).

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

 

Carbon Sequestration Challenges in Kentucky*

By

James A. Drahovzal1, Brandon C. Nuttall1, Stephen F. Greb1, Thomas M. Parris1, David C. Harris1, and Cortland F. Eble1

 

Search and Discovery Article #80012 (2008)

Posted October 22, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas, April 20-23, 2008

1Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

 

Abstract

The State legislature of Kentucky recently passed legislation to provide incentives for coal-to-liquids and coal-to-gas facilities in Kentucky. The incentives include funding for the drilling of a deep research test well in each of the two Kentucky coal fields located in the Appalachian and the Illinois Basins. The goal of the two drill holes will be to provide detailed data critical for assessing the potential of specific reservoirs that are deeper than 2,500 feet for long-term CO2 sequestration. In addition to the study of large-scale, "permanent" reservoirs, the legislation also calls for specific data collection with regard to the enhanced oil and gas recovery potential of existing Kentucky oil and gas fields. The challenge of this drilling program will lie in the selection of two sites that represent the complex and varied deep geology of the state, with broad applicability to the proposed facilities. Because coal-to-fuels facilities have lifetimes up to 40 years and will generate as much as 5 million tonnes of CO2 each year, massive reservoir capacities will be required. Although Kentucky has projected an estimated 7.2 billion tonnes of geologic capacity in deep saline aquifers and oil and gas fields, the details of reservoir- and seal-rock parameters, such as porosity, permeability, injectivity, capillary entry pressure, and degree of fracturing at depth, remain largely unknown. An additional 25 billion tonnes of storage may be available in organic-rich shales by means of adsorption of CO2, but this is speculative and requires confirmation. Data collected from the drilling and analyses of the two wells will help to inform decision makers about the viability of future development of the proposed facilities in Kentucky. Such facilities are important to the future economy and use of coal in the Commonwealth, as well as to that of the Nation.

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uOutline

uBackground

uHB1

uPartnership

uSubprojects

uW. Kentucky Project

uPartnership roles

uProject schedule

uData analysis

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgements

 

 

 

Outline

Kentucky House Bill 1 legislation that:

encourages development of coal-gasification facilities

provides Kentucky Geological Survey funding for geologic carbon-storage research

Resulting KGS carbon storage projects

Western Kentucky deep drilling project

 

Background

Kentucky HB 1 passed in August 2007

Provides financial incentives for development of coal-gasification plants

In Kentucky

Use Kentucky coal

Carbon-capture ready

Provides $5 million to KGS for geologic carbon storage research

Encouraged to use the $5 million to match available federal and private funds

 

2007 HB1 Directives

Quantify the potential for:

CO2 EOR

CO2 EGR

Test the organic-rich Devonian gas shales

CO2 EOR

CO2 storage potential

Drill deep tests to estimate permanent storage potential

Eastern Coal Field

Western Coal Field

 

Organization of Partnership

KGS realizes that $5 million is not sufficient to accomplish all these goals.

Developed and is still developing partnerships.

Created a joint industry-government consortium to carry out the directives.

Kentucky Consortium for Carbon Storage (KYCCS) administered by KGS at the University of Kentucky (Web site: www.kyccs.org)

 

Five Subprojects

CO2 enhanced oil recovery

CO2 enhanced gas recovery/Devonian shale

Western Kentucky deep CO2 storage

Eastern Kentucky deep CO2 storage

Public relations and technology transfer

 

Western Kentucky Deep Drilling Project

Funding Partners

ConocoPhillips, E.ON U.S. LLC, Kentucky Syngas, LLC, Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Kentucky Governor’s Office of Energy Policy, Smith Management Group, State of Illinois Office of Coal Development, Schlumberger Carbon Services

Associate Partners

Big Rivers Electric Corp., GEO Consultants, LLC, Henderson County Riverport Authority, ICON Construction, Inc., Praxair Inc., Tennessee Valley Authority, Sunshine Oil and Gas, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, URS Corp.

Project

Farthest along of the projects

Drill-site selection criteria (primarily geologic)

As representative of the regional geology as possible

Maximum depth 8,000 feet

Porosity of the Mt. Simon is higher at shallower depths

Drilling and testing cost considerations (up to $7 million)

Test the entire sedimentary section to basement for both sink and seal characteristics

Target reservoir zones below 2,500 feet depth

Knox Group: Primary target

Mt. Simon Sandstone: Secondary target

Other targets: New Albany Shale, Silurian dolomites, St. Peter Sandstone, Gunter Sandstone (Knox), Precambrian sandstones

Must be within the western coal producing area

Screening for location relied regional seismic data (only 7 basement test)

 

Partnership Roles

Partners (utilities, energy companies, service companies, state agencies, U.S. DOE) are agreeing to:

contribute cash

provide in-kind services

provide well sites

share in the planning

Not-for-profit organization: Western Kentucky Carbon Storage Foundation Inc.

KGS selects projects and sites, and allocates funds

All results are public

 

Project Schedule

Project will require 3 to 4 years for completion

Projects to run concurrently

Deep drilling is the first priority due to lead time required in identifying partners, drilling rigs, and funding

Western Kentucky deep-drilling project started

Drilling expected to commence within the year

Collecting seismic data in area of well before drilling

Partners for the other projects currently being sought

 

Data to be Collected and Analyzed

Additional seismic data will be collected prior to drillings will tell us if Mt Simon is at drill location

Whole core and side-wall cores in reservoir and seal intervals

Run and interpret extensive suite of well logs

Collect fluid samples (brine, oil, gas) from target zones for geochemistry

Analyze core samples for porosity, permeability, mineralogy, mechanical strength, and other physical properties

Conduct injection tests using fluid, air, or CO2

 

Conclusions

HB-1 is an opportunity to assess geologic CO2 enhanced recovery and permanent storage options in Kentucky with better data sets than in the past

The deep drilling project in western Kentucky has progressed the farthest

Updated results of this and the other projects will be reported at future meetings over the next 4-5 years

Still looking for partners

References

Drahovzal, J.A., 1997, Proterozoic sequences and their implications for Precambrian and Cambrian geologic evolution of western Kentucky: Evidence from seismic-reflection data: Seismological Research Letters, v. 68, no. 4, p. 553-566.

Metarko, T. A., 1980, Porosity, water chemistry, cement and grain fabric with depth in the Upper Cambrian Mount Simon and LaMotte sandstones of the Illinois basin: Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 88 p.

KunleDare, Mojisola, A., 2003, Effect of early cementation on the development of secondary porosity in sandstones — Examples from the Cambrian of Illinois Basin (abstract): Search and Discovery Article #90020 (2003)

Makowitz, Astrid, 2004, The genetic association between brittle deformation and quartz cementation elucidated by scanned cathodoluminescence imaging: Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

 

Acknowledgements

Partners

Basin Petroleum, Big Rivers Electric Corp., ConocoPhillips, E.ON U.S., LLC, GEO Consultants, LLC, Henderson County Riverport Authority, ICON Construction, Inc., Kentucky Syngas, LLC, Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Kentucky Governor's Office of Energy Policy, Praxair Inc., Smith Management Group, State of Illinois Office of Coal Development, Schlumberger Carbon Services, Sunshine Oil and Gas, Tennessee Valley Authority, University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, URS Corp.

PIs for the Western Kentucky Deep Drilling Project

David Williams

Rick Bowersox

Return to top.