--> Comparison of Attributes and Formation of Stratal Carapaces Versus Halokinetic Sequences, by Katherine A. Giles, #40207 (2006).

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Comparison of Attributes and Formation of Stratal Carapaces Versus Halokinetic Sequences*

By

Katherine A. Giles1

 

Search and Discovery Article #40207 (2006)

Posted August 3, 2006

 

*Oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, April 9-12, 2006. Appreciation is expressed to GCSSEPM, Norman C. Rosen, Executive Director, and to SEG for permission to present images from their publications.

 

Click to view presentation in PDF format (2.2 mb).

 

1Institute of Tectonic Studies, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM ([email protected])

 

Abstract 

Stratal carapaces and halokinetic sequences are distinctive stratigraphic packages associated with near-surface salt diapir rise and provide the basis for interpretation of diapiric history. Stratal carapaces are defined as subparallel, conformable strata originally deposited semi-conformably over bathymetrically raised broad salt domes, canopies, and sheets. Halokinetic sequences are angular unconformity-bounded growth strata deposited directly adjacent to and over the margins of bathymetrically raised salt domes, canopies, and sheets. During deposition isopachous carapace strata transition laterally into expanding halokinetic sequence wedges and thus form a linked system whose character is influenced by diapiric rise and sediment accumulation.  

Carapaces become isolated and rotated from adjacent strata by post-depositional lateral flow of salt from underneath the package. Carapace facies tend to be condensed and homogenous due to accumulation on top of the rising diapir, sheltered from sediment fairways. In contrast, halokinetic sequences are syndepositionally, progressively rotated by the rise of salt and complimentary sediment subsidence (i.e., downbuilding process). The facies record the complex interplay of local variations in sediment accumulation versus diapiric rise rate and include basal sediment gravity flow units, overlain by onlap and overlap sand-prone facies. Tabular shape and abrupt termination of the isopachous carapace layers results from lateral salt flow breakout at the diapir top /margin transition. Tapering carapace edge shape and expanding termination strata indicate lateral breakout at the diapir margin/minibasin transition. Rotated carapace blocks may be onlapped by wedge shape growth strata that are not considered halokinetic sequences because they are not generated at the salt-sediment interface.

 

Selected Figures 

Seismic line of regional salt system.

Stratal carapace (from Hart et al., 2004). Carapace strata shown in their depositional position above a topographically raised, deep-water salt sheet.

Rotated carapace (from Hart et al., 2004).

Halokinetic sequences.

Depositionally linked system (from Hodgkins and O’Brien, 1994).

Seismic profile of Mica diapir (after Hart et al., 2004).

Seismic profile of margin-base salt breakout.

 

References 

Giles, Katherine A., and Timothy F. Lawton, 2002, Halokinetic sequence stratigraphy adjacent to the El Papalote diapir, northeastern Mexico: AAPG Bulletin, v. 86, no. 5 p. 823-840.

Harrison, H., and B. Patton, 1995, Translation of salt sheets by basal shear, in C.J. Travis, H. Harrison, M.R. Hudec, B.C. Vendeville, F.J. Peel, and B.F. Perkins, eds., Salt, sediment, and hydrocarbons: Gulf Coast Section SEPM 16th Annual Research Conference, p. 99-107.

Hart, William, Jacek Jaminski, and Martin Albertin, 2004, Recognition and Exploration Significance of Supra-Salt Stratal Carapaces: Salt-sediment interactions and hydrocarbon prospectivity, in Concepts, applications, and case histories for the 21st century: 24 Annual GCSSEPM Foundation Bob F. Perkins Research Conference.

Hodgkins, Margaret A., and Michael J. O'Brien, 1994, Salt sill deformation and its implications for subsalt exploration: The Leading Edge, v. 13; no. 8; p. 849-851.