--> Uniting Petrophysics and Stratigraphy to Decipher Classified Facies From a Pre-Stack 3-D Inversion: Wolfcamp and Spraberry, Howard County, Midland Basin
[First Hit]

AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Uniting Petrophysics and Stratigraphy to Decipher Classified Facies Previous HitFromNext Hit a Pre-Stack Previous Hit3-DNext Hit Previous HitInversionNext Hit: Wolfcamp and Spraberry, Howard County, Midland Basin

Abstract

Geologically-constrained pre-stack 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit can potentially predict reservoir properties ahead of the drill bit. Using a 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit dataset Previous HitfromNext Hit the Midland Basin, we integrate pre-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit with petrophysics and sequence stratigraphy to derive reservoir facies architecture and corresponding geomechanics. This multi-disciplinary collaboration results in Previous HitseismicNext Hit volumes of classified lithofacies and geomechanical properties that assist Wolfberry exploitation, and is testimony to achieving full value Previous HitfromNext Hit 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit in an unconventional play. The Wolfcamp and Spraberry (Wolfberry) sections lie in toe-of-slope depositional positions within the Midland Basin. Production is Previous HitfromNext Hit organic-rich, transgressive basinal mudstones interbedded with siliciclastic and carbonate debrite and turbidite beds. Optimal completions practices rely on fully understanding the lateral and vertical distribution of the desired mudrock source beds. Pre-stack Previous HitinversionNext Hit allows capturing of shear wave velocity information, otherwise lost in the offset domain of post-stack Previous HitinversionNext Hit. Pre-stack Previous HitinversionNext Hit provides P and S impedance (Ip and Is) which in turn yield elastic constants Lambda and Mu. Petrophysically-defined, wireline log-derived facies classifications can be cross-plotted to define Lambda-Rho, Mu-Rho (LMR) regions. Comparing Lambda-Mu-Rho (LMR) cross plots calculated Previous HitfromNext Hit the well log Previous HitdataNext Hit with similar Previous HitdataNext Hit derived Previous HitfromNext Hit inverted Previous HitseismicNext Hit impedances helped delineate facies families, or depositional trends within the 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit. Wolfberry lithofacies and geomechanical properties were thus highlighted Previous HitfromNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit results and mapped into the sequence-scale basin architecture. Geomechanical parameters were defined Previous HitfromNext Hit the Previous HitinversionNext Hit results at a scale useful for completion engineers. This up-scaling of the petrophysical solution yields vertical resolution of the Previous HitinversionNext Hit comparable with the scale of mechanical stratigraphy that controls well completions. Using a properly processed Previous HitseismicNext Hit dataset as input, pre-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit deliverables (Ip and Is) were used in conjunction with petrophysics to define facies and geomechanical parameters critical to efficient exploitation. Because of its superior areal extent and degree of spatial sampling, 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataTop can be extensively mined for reservoir properties and geomodel characteristics to become the canvas for a multidisciplinary compilation for any given unconventional play.