--> Abstract: Innovations in Visualization Open New Possibilities for Interpreters, by Bruno de Ribet; #90206 (2014)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Innovations in Visualization Open New Possibilities for Interpreters

Bruno de Ribet
Paradigm, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Visualization technology is continuously evolving, with the growing availability of rendering and transparency capabilities scalable to common computer architectures. To date, this evolution has followed two main trends. The first has the objective of handling ever-increasing amounts of Previous HitdataNext Hit, while the second aims to enrich the visualization process with a greater number of Previous HitdataNext Hit types and the rendering of specific objects.

In the past several years, Previous HitdataNext Hit storage technology has expanded dramatically to allow the storage and processing of huge amounts of Previous HitdataNext Hit on disk rather than in computer memory, making it possible to view Previous HitdataNext Hit sets which are much larger than the computer's physical memory. This is most relevant for the tens or hundreds of gigabytes of Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit often required for a single survey. It has also opened the door to the use of 3D Previous HitdisplayNext Hit and interpretation tools within routine workflows, while leaving high-end capabilities such as automated sub-volume detection to the dedicated visualization tools which work only on Previous HitdataNext Hit in live computer memory.

Additionally, dramatic improvements in the performance of input/output devices, as well as in computer power and Previous HitdataNext Hit handling, are enabling many capabilities, once available only in computer memory, to also become feasible for Previous HitdataNext Hit residing on disk. One of these is optical stacking, or the application of transparency capabilities to multi-line 2D Previous HitseismicNext Hit surveys. This technique, which lets the user line up a succession of 2D profiles and move the Previous HitdisplayNext Hit around in three dimensions, eliminates the lengthy and tedious back-and-forth workflows sometimes needed to verify assumptions regarding a fault's direction and development. This is particularly relevant to 2D Previous HitseismicNext Hit profiles, where ambiguities are more frequent due to the nature and limitations of the Previous HitdataNext Hit and of sections as opposed to 3D migrated volumes.

A holistic look at Previous HitdataNext Hit
The huge increase in Previous HitdataNext Hit size, resolution and fold are further augmented by the accessibility of many types of Previous HitdataNext Hit, including Previous HitseismicNext Hit, wells, microseismic, 4D, wellbore, video and others, allowing a more holistic look at the regions, basins, formations and reservoirs under investigation. In addition to Previous HitdataNext Hit for the particular area of interest, the interpreter is now able to access all regional Previous HitdataNext Hit, including project and vintage Previous HitdataNext Hit from previous surveys.

From single survey, single volume to multi-survey, multi-volume capabilities
Until recently, all advanced interpretation work was done using a single survey, single volume approach. Interpreters would load a 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit volume into their system, and then work on that particular volume. Today, technology enables interpreters to load multiple 3D volumes from multiple surveys, and all the 2D profile Previous HitdataNext Hit as well, enhanced by many other Previous HitdataNext Hit types available to the company within and around the area of interest. This provides them with new insight into the geology of the entire region, and leads to better and more informed decisions down the line.

New visualization perspectives
With so much Previous HitdataNext Hit now available, and with massive Previous HitdataNext Hit integration now possible at the desktop level, interpreters are in danger of being overwhelmed. Indeed, one of the greatest challenges before the interpreter today is to come up with new visualization technologies and interpretation workflows to fully utilize the new Previous HitdataNext Hit within tight project deadlines.

One of the most dramatic recent developments has been the release to the market of new, highly parallelized compute power capabilities (GPU – Graphic Processing Units), to perform computation traditionally handled by a CPU.

This technique is being adapted to improve the visualization process. The use of GPU-based 3D rendering improves the refresh speed of visual displays by at least X8, while also enhancing the visual integrity of the Previous HitdisplayNext Hit, without any other rendering artifacts, like distortion in the deeper scene. A direct consequence for the interpreter is the use of GPU for computing Previous HitseismicNext Hit attributes almost instantaneously, improving productivity working interactively with large amount of such Previous HitdataNext Hit.

Automation speeds up the process
The increase of automation in every aspect of the interpretation process has been another game changer. Some of the most notable developments include the advent of waveform-based, automatic horizon propagation, which has resulted in a major acceleration of the interpretation workflow, due to its speed and accuracy. Automatic fault extraction techniques enable Previous HitseismicNext Hit interpreters to quickly pick hundreds of faults at a time, allowing them to concentrate on geologic history rather than on the tedious picking process. A powerful tool for interactive cross-plotting within a 3D visualization environment is now commonly available for use, enabling advanced multi-attribute interpretation. Furthermore, automated switching between full resolution and decimated datasets enables the interpreter to switch back and forth between the regional, local and reservoir detail scales of a project at a click of the mouse.

The age of pre-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit
Traditionally, pre-stack processing and interpretation were performed by experts using specialized software, such as AVO inversion, velocity analysis, and others. Pre-stack interpretation was not traditionally part of mainstream interpretation workflows. But while interpreting pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit may be challenging to the interpreter working at the desktop, the information it offers is highly valuable. Pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit, as required for transformation to the elastic properties domain, are providing dynamic and kinematic information related to the quality of the processing. This information helps validate interpretations, provides improved calibration to well Previous HitdataNext Hit, and is suitable for detailed analysis such as cross-plotting.

The growth of interest in pre-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit has been putting pressure on visualization tools to help interpreters manipulate not only large amounts of Previous HitdataNext Hit, but also Previous HitdataNext Hit objects that are extensions to the post-stack x-y-time or x-y-depth coordinate system. The demand for visual access to the pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit stems from the challenges of investigating very detailed features in the process of qualifying and characterizing the subsurface. And indeed, the ability to directly access and Previous HitdisplayNext Hit pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit is one of the new tools that have recently come onto the market.

The emergence of pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit as a component of many workflows requires more than just an ability to see trace Previous HitdataNext Hit, however. The inherent complexity of ray paths through the overburden, the sheer volume of Previous HitdataNext Hit that needs to be accessed, and the effects of anisotropy on waveform propagation are only some of the challenges facing deadline-constrained geoscientists who are often required to make sense of 30 to 50 times more Previous HitdataNext Hit than before. In order to manage pre-stack Previous HitdataNext Hit, and in order to locate a specific point in space, one needs to develop not only new Previous HitdataNext Hit access and Previous HitdisplayNext Hit capabilities, but also new ways to interpret the results. Visualization tools, new Previous HitdisplayTop methods, processes that make visible the illumination that resulted in a given reflector or event, are all part of the answer, and will become increasingly accessible to users.

The technology frontier
All of the powerful new tools described in this abstract are at today's technology frontier, and are already being used by first adopters in the industry. This presentation will illustrate those available technologies and workflows as a ubiquitous solution for routine activities to be performed by a new generation of geoscientists.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90206 © AAPG Hedberg Conference, Interpretation Visualization in the Petroleum Industry, Houston, Texas, June 1-4, 2014