--> Abstract: Pitfalls in Seismic Amplitude Interpretation: Lessons from Oligocene Channel Sandstones, by Hari Lal, S.K. Biswal, and J.L. Nangia; #90077 (2008)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Pitfalls in Seismic Amplitude Interpretation: Lessons from Oligocene Channel Sandstones

Hari Lal*, S.K. Biswal, and J.L. Nangia
ONGC, India
*[email protected]

An high-amplitude 3-D seismic anomaly in an Upper Oligocene clastic sequence depicted a channel depositional signature and was interpreted as a Previous HitbrightNext Hit Previous HitspotNext Hit generated from gas-sands. Upon drilling, however, it was found water-bearing. The post-drill appraisal, based on the interpretation of pre-stack time-migrated data using 3-D visualization techniques, reconfirmed the Previous HitbrightNext Hit Previous HitspotNext Hit and large channel. The geostatistical cross-plots between net-sand-thickness and seismic amplitude showed a direct proportionate relationship. Impedance versus lithology cross-plots showed varying inter-relationships. Gas-bearing sandstones have higher impedance in some wells and lower impedance in other wells with respect to the enclosing shales. The Previous HitbrightNext Hit Previous HitspotTop was produced by thick, high-impedance porous sandstones deposited in a fluvial to estuarine channel. The amplitude-versus-offset (AVO) responses of water-sands in a new well did not show an AVO anomaly, whereas gas-bearing sands in an existing well showed a good class-II anomaly. The interpretation pitfalls could have been avoided by more studies like AVO.

 

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90077©2008 GEO 2008 Middle East Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain