End-Signature
of Deep-Marine Basin-Fill, as a Structurally Confined Low-Gradient Clastic Slope: the Middle Eocene Guaso
System, South-Central Spanish
Sutcliffe, Clare1, Kevin
Pickering2 (1)
Few studies consider the way in which
systems change their architectural style as basins infills
through time, despite mounting evidence that small changes
to controls can lead to multiple architectural styles of deep-water sandy
systems.
We present an example of sheet-like sandbodies with internal complexity (due to the stacking of
multiple shallow erosional channels), which represent
the final stages of deep-marine basin infill. Mapping of the Guaso system (Eocene deep marine system, south central
The first-order control on the
basin-scale accommodation space was tectonically-driven phases of subsidence.
As there are 20 -25 discrete deep-marine sandbodies
within the Ainsa basin, that
accumulated over ~ 10 million years, they were most likely controlled by
a eustatic driver such as the Milankovitch-type
cyclicity at ~ 400 ka. The critical end-signature of
deep-marine basinal deposition was that the tectonic
driver on subsidence was effectively removed, or at least much reduced. At this
stage, the next eustatic sea-level fall was
insufficient to cause the cutting of canyons or relatively deeply-incised slope
channels, as had been the case with earlier clastic
systems. Such clastic slopes, with their
characteristic depositional architecture, probably characterize the
end-signature for the infill of shallowing-up
deep-marine basins where a tectonic driver on subsidence is removed, leaving eustasy as the principal control on sediment flux.
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90063©2007 AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California