--> ABSTRACT: Crosswell Seismic and Electromagnetic Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration, by G. Michael Hoversten, Ernest Majer, and Thomas M. Daley; #90906(2001)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

G. Michael Hoversten1, Ernest Majer1, Thomas M. Daley1

(1) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

ABSTRACT: Crosswell Previous HitSeismicNext Hit and Electromagnetic Previous HitMonitoringNext Hit of CO2 Sequestration

Previous HitMonitoringNext Hit of geologic sequestration of CO2 has been identified as a high priority need in recent industry, academic, and government sponsored workshops. Previous HitMonitoringNext Hit is required for determining the efficiency with which available sequestration capacity has been utilized, to optimize collateral economically benefit, and to ensure safety by demonstrating retention of CO2 in the target formation.

Geophysical techniques provide the most cost-effective spatial coverage required for mapping CO2 in the subsurface. An iterative process of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit simulation, forward and inverse modeling can be used to access the effectiveness of candidate geophysical methods and to optimize Previous HitmonitoringNext Hit systems. The process is demonstrated based on Previous HitreservoirNext Hit simulations conducted prior to injection of CO2 in a petroleum Previous HitreservoirNext Hit.

Field data and numerical model results are presented from a Previous HitmonitoringNext Hit experiment conducted during CO2 injection in the Lost Hills Previous HitreservoirNext Hit in Southern California. Cross well Previous HitseismicNext Hit and electromagnetic (EM) data have been recorded before, during and after the CO2 flood. Observed changes in the travel time and frequency content of the Previous HitseismicNext Hit data are accompanied by amplitude and phase changes in the EM data. These data are interpreted using travel time tomography and EM inversion. Previous HitReservoirNext Hit simulations conducted prior to injection provide a 3-D time-lapse model of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit and geophysical parameters. Forward calculations where made to predict the Previous HitseismicNext Hit and EM response. These predictions are compared to observations and an updated Previous HitreservoirTop model developed. Through inversion, the spatial resolution of the techniques used separately and in combination is assessed.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90906©2001 AAPG Annual Convention, Denver, Colorado