--> ABSTRACT: Three-Dimensional Calculation and Visualization of Fault Gauge Ratio, by K. Hoffman and J. Neave; #90908 (2000)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

ABSTRACT: Three-Dimensional Calculation and Visualization of Previous HitFaultNext Hit Gauge Ratio

HOFFMAN, KAREN, and JOHN NEAVE , Dynamic Graphics, Incorporated, Alameda, CA

Understanding the sealing characteristics of faults is critical in assessing the hydrocarbon potential of traps formed by faults. Previous HitFaultNext Hit gauge ratio and juxtaposition analysis have often been limited to a single cross section (a two-dimensional approach) or to a single, isolated Previous HitfaultNext Hit surface (a partial three-dimensional approach). A full three-dimensional solution has now been developed that calculates Previous HitfaultNext Hit gauge ratio using a continually varying clay volume fraction, a network of faults (isolated, dying, and/or branching), and displacement along the Previous HitfaultNext Hit surface (instead of just the dip component). Geometric reconstruction model-building techniques construct faults and horizons in three-dimensional space, allowing easy and rigorous calculation of juxtaposition and displacement.

The steps in calculating Previous HitfaultNext Hit gauge ratio in three-dimensional space are as follows: 1) create structural framework; 2) calculate Vcl as continually varying property within this structural framework; 3) determine displacement, allowing for oblique slip; and 4) calculate Previous HitfaultNext Hit gauge ratio for both hanging wall and foot wall blocks, and sum to determine the ratio for every point on the Previous HitfaultNext Hit.

Rigorous calculation of Previous HitfaultNext Hit gauge ratio depends on a robust structural model. With this model, a variety of scenarios may be investigated, thus incorporating uncertainty into the calculation. Determining whether a Previous HitfaultTop will act as a seal, or whether there is potential for development of leaks during the production of the reservoir depends on many variables. Minimizing the uncertainty of this part of the analysis may provide greater confidence in assessing the risk.

 

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90908©2000 GCAGS, Houston, Texas