--> Abstract: Optimization of Heavy-Oil Production by Steamflood from a Shallow Sandstone Reservoir, Midway-Sunset Field, Southern San Joaquin Basin, California, by S. Schamel, C. Forster, M. Deo, D. Sprinkel, K. Olson, M. Simmons, and C. Jenkins; #90937 (1998).

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract: Optimization of Heavy-Oil Production by Steamflood from a Shallow Sandstone Reservoir, Midway-Sunset Field, Southern San Joaquin Basin, California

SCHAMEL, STEVEN and CRAIG FORSTER, Energy & Geoscience Institute of the University of Utah: MILIND DEO, Department of Chemical and Fuels Engineering, University of Utah; DOUGLAS SPRINKEL, Utah Geological Survey; KEVIN OLSON and MICHAEL SIMMONS, ARCO Western Energy; and CRETIES JENKINS, ARCO Exploration and Production Technology

A previously idle portion of the Midway-Sunset field, the ARCO Western Energy Pru Fee property, is being brought back into commercial production through tight integration of geologic characterization, geostatistical modeling, reservoir simulation, and petroleum engineering. This property, shut-in over a decade ago as economically marginal using conventional cyclic steaming methods, has a 200-300 foot thick oil column in the Monarch Sand. However, the sand lacks effective steam barriers and has a thick water-saturation zone above the oil-water contact. These factors require an innovative approach to steam flood production design that will balance optimal total oil production against economically viable steam-oil ratios and production rates. The methods used in the Class III demonstration are accessible to most operators in the Midway-Sunset field and could be used to revitalize properties with declining production of heavy oils throughout the region.

The 40 ac Pru Fee property is located in the super-giant Midway-Sunset field and produces from the late Miocene Monarch Sand, part of the Monterey Formation. The Midway-Sunset field was discovered prior to 1890. Cumulative production from the field through 1995 was 2.3 billion barrels of oil and 563 billion cubic feet of gas, with remaining reserves estimated to exceed 450 MMBO. The average daily field production in 1995 was 163,400 barrels of oil. In the Pru Fee property, now held by ARCO Western Energy, cyclic steaming was used to produce 13° API oil. However, the previous operator was unable to develop profitably this marginal portion of the Midway-Sunset field using standard enhanced oil recovery technologies and chose rather to leave more than 3.0 MMBO of oil in the ground that otherwise might have been produced from the 40 ac property. Only 927 MBO had been produced from the property when it was shut-in in 1987. This is less than 10% of the original oil-in-place, which is insignificant compared to typical heavy oil recoveries in the Midway-Sunset field of 40 to 70%. The objective of the demonstration project is to encourage a similar incremental increase in production in all other marginal properties in the Midway-Sunset and adjacent fields in the southern San Jaoquin Basin.

In January 1997 the project entered its second and main phase with the purpose of demonstrating whether steamflood can be a more effective mode of production of the heavy, viscous oils from the Monarch Sand reservoir than the more conventional cyclic steaming. The objective is not just to produce the pilot site within the Pru Fee property south of Taft, but to test which production parameters optimize total oil recovery at economically acceptable rates of production and production costs.

During the initial phase of the project a multifaceted feasibility study was carried out to examine whether the pilot project could be justified technically and economically at this site. This study included:

1. Recompletion of 9 shut-in wells and drilling of an additional producer and a new temperature observation well. A core was taken from the reservoir interval in the new producer, Pru-101. The wells were produced by conventional cyclic steaming over a period of 15 months to establish a production baseline for the site.

2. Characterization of the stratigraphy and petrophysical properties of the Monarch Sand reservoir using existing well logs and analyses on samples in the core taken from Pru-101. The resulting data were used to develop a geostatistical model of the reservoir at the Pru Fee property and a specific reservoir simulator for the pilot test site on the property.

3. Use of the reservoir simulator to test various steamflood and cyclic steaming production options leading to design of a production strategy for the pilot steamflood based on a four pattern, 9-spot array covering 8 ac near the center of the 40 ac Pru Fee property. The array chosen required drilling additional producers and injectors to supplement the existing wells recompleted in the initial phase of the project.

Activities on the pilot site during 1997 included drilling 18 new wells - 11 producers (Pru-201 through Pru-211), 4 injectors (Pru 12-1 through Pru 12-4), and three temperature observation wells (TO-2 through TO-4). The drilling was started on January 14 and completed on March 16. All wells were logged. The four pattern, 9-spot array utilizes 10 preexisting wells that were recompleted and cyclic steamed in the initial phase of the project. All new wells were drilled into the oil-water contact to establish the depth of that horizon, then plugged to 30 ft above the oil -water contact (OWC).

Reservoir simulations with geostatistically generated data sets reveal that the initial fluid distribution in the reservoir has the most significant impact on the economics of the steam-flooding process. The initial fluid distribution is determined by the placement of the oil-water contact and the resulting transition zone in the reservoir. In order to avoid heating and moving large amounts of water by injecting into the transition zone, a new completion strategy is recommended. The new completion method is to complete both the injectors and producers a substantial stand-off above the OWC. The optimum completion is determined to be about 75-100 feet above the WOC. Production from the pilot is being carefully monitored and compared against predictions from the simulator to continually optimize production parameters and economics.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90937©1998 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, Utah