--> Abstract: Complex Allocthonous Salt Structures and Their Impact on Subsalt Illumination, by M. L. Albertin, D. Sedgeley, D. Kikkert, J. O. Mooney, A. Calvert, E. McCarron, M. O'Brien, and R. Priem; #90937 (1998).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract: Complex Allocthonous Salt Structures and Their Impact on Previous HitSubsaltNext Hit Illumination

ALBERTIN, MARTIN L., DAVID SEDGELEY, DAN KIKKERT, JUDY O. MOONEY, ALEXANDER CALVERT, EILEEN MCCARRON, MIKE O'BRIEN, Amoco Production Company, and RICH PRIEM, Priemere GeoTechnology LLC

The allocthonous salt bodies found on the Previous HitGulfNext Hit of Previous HitMexicoNext Hit Shelf (GOM Shelf) act as complex 3D lenses that severely distort wave propagation. Correct salt and Previous HitsubsaltNext Hit Previous HitimagingNext Hit require 3D depth migration before stack (3D MBS), but many 3D MBS images contain areas below salt which are devoid of reliable reflections. Although inadequate seismic processing and incorrect velocities are often cited as causes of poor Previous HitsubsaltNext Hit Previous HitimagingNext Hit, Previous HitsubsaltNext Hit shadow zones more often are representative of poor illumination with conventional surface P-wave seismic.

We use normal incidence ray-tracing, offset 3D ray-tracing, and finite difference seismic modeling to understand critical angle effects and acquisition limits common to surveys in regions with high salt-sediment velocity contrast and complex geologic structure. The ray-tracing data are captured on illumination maps; Previous HitsubsaltNext Hit horizons containing gaps in areas from which no rays can reach the surface. Using interpretive workstations, we find that structural attributes controlling the critical angle (base of salt dip, and change in Previous HitsubsaltNext Hit isopach) correlate extremely well with modeled illumination maps.

We further evaluate the quality of our 3D depth migrations by comparing the images with migrated finite difference models. If Previous HitsubsaltTop shadow zones observed on real data correlate with modeled illumination gaps, then we gain confidence in the depth image and ignore questionable events in the shadow zones. Poor correlation suggests we evaluate other causes, such as processing errors, migration parameters, velocity problems, or rock property effects.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90937©1998 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Salt Lake City, Utah