--> ABSTRACT: Detection of Hydrocarbons with Lithostratigraphy, by F. J. Hilterman, J. W. Sherwood, R. Schelihorn, B. Bankhead, and B. De Vault; #91021 (2010)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Detection of Hydrocarbons with Lithostratigraphy

HILTERMAN, FRED J., JOHN W. SHERWOOD, ROBERT SCHELLHORN, and BRAD BANKHEAD, and BRIAN DE VAULT

In many basins, the acoustic-impedance values of shales and gas-saturated sands are approximately equal and thus hydrocarbons are difficult to detect with conventional Previous Hit3-DNext Hit seismic data. Even AVO has had limited success because of the questionable relationship of the AVO attributes to media properties.

In order to resolve these questions, a Previous Hit3-DNext Hit AVO study was conducted utilizing well-logs, cores, and production data to help calibrate the seismic response to the media properties. The subsequent AVO inversion yields two distinct reflectivities, a normal-incidence and a Poisson. The estimation of the Poisson-reflectivity section is stabilized by including CDP traces that have offsets as great as twice the depth. This requires the inclusion of an isotropic Previous HitcorrectionsTop in the total processing flow.

The reflectivities are then related to chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic sections. The lithologic correlation results from petrophysical relationships of SP well-log curves to Poisson's ratio curves while the chronostratigraphic correlation relies on seismic-stratigraphy. The benefit of these two sections is that the lithostratigraphic section (Poisson reflectivity), contains only very clean wet sand and/or gas-saturated sand events while the normal incidence section is a high resolution structural image.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91021©1997 AAPG Annual Convention, Dallas, Texas.