--> Abstract: How Laterally Extensive Are Sequence Boundaries?, by J. A. Cartwright; #90990 (1993).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

CARTWRIGHT, JOSEPH A., Imperial College, London, England

ABSTRACT: How Laterally Extensive Are Previous HitSequenceNext Hit Previous HitBoundariesNext Hit?

Previous HitSequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit are the foundation on which modern Previous HitsequenceNext Hit stratigraphic concepts have been erected. They are widely portrayed as discrete surfaces that are correlatable on the scales of basins. They comprise surfaces of stratal discontinuity (onlap, downlap, toplap, and erosional truncation) linked by uniquely defined correlative conformities. They are distinguished from local discontinuity surfaces by their property of regional extent. Onlap surfaces are absolutely central to the definition of type 1 and type 2 Previous HitsequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit, and set the chronostratigraphic clock by which the correlative conformity for any given Previous HitsequenceNext Hit boundary can be uniquely defined.

This paper examines the conditions necessary for the development of onlap onto a discrete surface. Drawing extensively from Van Hinte's conception of condensed onlap sections and apparent Previous HitseismicNext Hit onlap, a simple geometric argument is presented that establishes a rigorous constraint on the development of a discrete onlap surface. The main conclusion is that a discrete onlap surface can form only if there is no net sediment accumulation beyond the lap-out position. Consideration of depositional processes in a range of environments suggests that this condition is rarely met, and consequently, laterally extensive onlap onto a discrete surface is extremely rare. It is more common to find that onlap develops onto families of closely related surfaces that may appear as a single surface on se smic data, and that may be mistakenly correlated over large areas. An extensive correlation of apparent onlap surfaces will cross time lines and should not be used to erect a chronostratigraphic framework.

The areal extent of Previous HitsequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit is a prerequisite for the eustatist's view of stratigraphy. If it is assumed that Previous HitsequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit have an eustatic origin, then there is a tacit expectation that they should be correlatable over large areas. It is concluded that the apparent areal extent of Previous HitsequenceNext Hit Previous HitboundariesNext Hit owes more to the map-driven need to correlate over large areas and to the limited vertical resolution of Previous HitseismicTop data than to stratigraphic reality.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90990©1993 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, The Hague, Netherlands, October 17-20, 1993.